Skip to main content

Reverse program done with help (Ruby Program pt. 8)

On Tuesday night I went to the Ruby L.A. group and had a good time. Learned quite a bit. And the reverse program is done! So I described what I wanted to do and Evan, the group leader, had an even more elegant solution.

So my idea was (as I described in a previous post) to go through the line and read each character match it to the Unicode character-sets boundaries (using their hex-code numbers) and ingest it into an array in one or two or three character chunks per element. Then reverse the order of the elements in the array by passing them to another array and output that.

In the group I learned that arrays have a reverse method. So it's real easy to reverse them. But the coolest thing was how Evan proposed solving it.

Scan
Evan used the scan method (one I had heard about but haven't quite mastered) but here is the cool thing, by escaping the characters as Unicode the scan method basically does in one step what I wanted to do in many. Scan will spit out an array of elements that are split by whatever argument is fed to the scan method. You can have scan capture all the digits in a string, or in this case all the Unicode characters in a string. So scan check each element in order if it's a Unicode character (which all are going to be) it gets put into the array. Then I reverse the array and join it into a string again.

I had no idea you could use a Unicode Characters as an argument using what's called a regular expression. Which sound rather common and easy to understand but are in fact rather obtuse. They're a way of writing things the way the program sees them, but they are not intuitive or well explained in the books I have so far. So more on this later.

Right now the program works on any UTF8 file with no BOM(Byte Order Marking), something relatively easy to make on Notepad++.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Building my own home.

I've decided. I want to build my own home. There is something special about building your own things. I built a desk for my tiny room when I first moved to L.A. My room was so small that I had to sit on the bed to use the computer so I build a high desk so I could sit on the bed and work on the computer. My roommate Trentity helped me cut the ply-wood to the right side. I still have that desk. It now sits on the living room covered by a cloth hiding the surplus of costume parts my current roommate Sean uses in his creations. Learning to build and fix things continue. And the feeling of satisfaction from fixing even small things is great. So a few years ago I heard on the NPR program the Story about a couple of educators that moved to a tent in their back-yard so they could rent their house and afford to send their kids to college. They had a special type of tent called a yurt and cooked and showered in an RV they had parked next to it. I thought I could do that. Housing in Lo

Contrasting Styles of Writing: English vs. Spanish

There is interestingly enough a big difference between what's considered good writing in Spanish and English . V.S. Naipul winner of the 2001 Nobel prize for literature publish an article on writing . In it he emphasizes the use of short clear sentences and encourages the lack of adjectives and adverbs. Essentially he pushes the writer to abandon florid language and master spartan communication . This is a desired feature of English prose , where short clipped sentences are the norm and seamlessly flow into a paragraph. In English prose the paragraph is the unit the writer cares about the most. This is not the case in Spanish where whole short stories (I'm thinking this was Gabriel Garcia Marquez but maybe it was Cortázar) are written in one sentence. Something so difficult to do in English that the expert translator could best manage to encapsulate the tale in two sentences. The florid language is what is considered good writing in Spanish but unfortunately this has lead t

My Fake Resume

Inspired by the over aggrandized bio of Joseph Rakofsky I want to write my own. If you don't know who he is; Joseph Rakofsky is a lawyer who earned a mistrial for a criminal client due to his (alleged) incompetence as reported on the Washington Post . There has been quite a few commentaries on his "Streisand-house" approach of suing all the bloggers and even the Washington Post and American Bar Association for reporting his (alleged) ineptitude. ("Streisand-house" is what happened to Barbara Streisand who wanted to have a picture of her mansion removed from the internet and she sued to have it removed. Unfortunately suing requires the filing of public documents with a picture of her house. The lawsuit had the direct opposite effect it intended. Everybody now could see legally, since it was a public document, a picture of her house.) But all that internet gossip aside I'm most impressed by his resume. Here is a quote from the website: Prior to stud