Skip to main content

Amazon's A-B Testing and Government Applications

One of the benefits of scientific research is that by being empirical or experimentally driven it avoids circular and endless discussions on what works or should work. You can just check it. You test to see what works. Jeff Bezos described in a Stanford lecture how Amazon utilizes this testing in it's site live to verify improvements. The ability to test which option is best increases efficiency as it cuts down not only on inefficient options but also on the time that would have been spent discussing the pros and cons of each approach. At Amazon this approach is called A-B testing. Where one option "A" is tested against option "B" and the results are seen immediately. This data-driven approach is what makes science edge out over other disciplines, and it's one that seems sorely lacking on the social sciences, where argument rather than data still reigns king. It doesn't matter that "trickle down economics" didn't have it's intended effect if the data is analyzed, what matters is that the argument sounds right and wins out over it's opposition.

I think it's high time that this data-driven approach be brought to our public institutions like government. In Amazon's elegant A-B testing approach (possibly with the addition of a C control) would be fantastic to test approaches with real data as opposed to talking heads on congress or the media. Think about simple things such as tax laws. Imagine if instead of it being driven by mere legislators it was goal driven and experimentally tested. Many laws fail in its intended purpose because debate or rationally doesn't drive human behavior. We are emotional creatures and not driven by cool dispassionate reason. Society's glorification of reason is a offspring of the Enlightenment the period that saw the birth of the nation of the United States. The Enlightenment which held reason above the then wide authority of the church, found liberty and practicality in its look at rationality. But now we're hitting the limits of such view. We are seeing the failure of reason. We need to use experimentation more. Forget about what "should" work and see what actually does work. What's great is that this is being used by businesses now. We don't have to invent it. Amazon does it with it's A-B testing and gets real time results. Can't we do it with laws too? How much easier would it be to vote on which tax law to approve or which ballot initiative if the data was already in? It may be hard to convince someone that changing something can be beneficial without this data but far more dangerous are things that sound rationally right but experimentally fail to accomplish their set goals, like the supposed "benefit" of trickle down economics.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Building my own home.

I've decided. I want to build my own home. There is something special about building your own things. I built a desk for my tiny room when I first moved to L.A. My room was so small that I had to sit on the bed to use the computer so I build a high desk so I could sit on the bed and work on the computer. My roommate Trentity helped me cut the ply-wood to the right side. I still have that desk. It now sits on the living room covered by a cloth hiding the surplus of costume parts my current roommate Sean uses in his creations. Learning to build and fix things continue. And the feeling of satisfaction from fixing even small things is great. So a few years ago I heard on the NPR program the Story about a couple of educators that moved to a tent in their back-yard so they could rent their house and afford to send their kids to college. They had a special type of tent called a yurt and cooked and showered in an RV they had parked next to it. I thought I could do that. Housing in Lo
2 comments
Read more

Contrasting Styles of Writing: English vs. Spanish

There is interestingly enough a big difference between what's considered good writing in Spanish and English . V.S. Naipul winner of the 2001 Nobel prize for literature publish an article on writing . In it he emphasizes the use of short clear sentences and encourages the lack of adjectives and adverbs. Essentially he pushes the writer to abandon florid language and master spartan communication . This is a desired feature of English prose , where short clipped sentences are the norm and seamlessly flow into a paragraph. In English prose the paragraph is the unit the writer cares about the most. This is not the case in Spanish where whole short stories (I'm thinking this was Gabriel Garcia Marquez but maybe it was Cortázar) are written in one sentence. Something so difficult to do in English that the expert translator could best manage to encapsulate the tale in two sentences. The florid language is what is considered good writing in Spanish but unfortunately this has lead t
3 comments
Read more

My Fake Resume

Inspired by the over aggrandized bio of Joseph Rakofsky I want to write my own. If you don't know who he is; Joseph Rakofsky is a lawyer who earned a mistrial for a criminal client due to his (alleged) incompetence as reported on the Washington Post . There has been quite a few commentaries on his "Streisand-house" approach of suing all the bloggers and even the Washington Post and American Bar Association for reporting his (alleged) ineptitude. ("Streisand-house" is what happened to Barbara Streisand who wanted to have a picture of her mansion removed from the internet and she sued to have it removed. Unfortunately suing requires the filing of public documents with a picture of her house. The lawsuit had the direct opposite effect it intended. Everybody now could see legally, since it was a public document, a picture of her house.) But all that internet gossip aside I'm most impressed by his resume. Here is a quote from the website: Prior to stud
1 comment
Read more